Redigerer Wikisida.no:Innholdspolitikk

Wikipedias innhold er styrt av tre kjerneprinsipper: [[WP:NPOV|nøytralt ståsted]], [[WP:V|verifiserbarhet]] og [[WP:NOR|ingen original forskning]]. Bidragsytere bør gjøre seg kjent med alle tre, og tolke dem i sammenheng:

#'''Nøytralt ståsted''' &ndash; Alle Wikipedia-artikler og annet encyclopedisk innhold må skrives fra et ''nøytralt ståsted'' ved å representere vesentlige syn rettferdig, i riktige proporsjoner og uten slagside.
#'''Verifiserbarhet''' &ndash; Materiale som har blitt utfordret eller [[WP:LIKELY|sannsynligvis kan bli utfordret]], samt alle sitater, må dekkes av en pålitelig, publisert kilde. Grensen for inklusjon på Wikipedia er verifiserbarhet, ikke sannhet &ndash; i denne sammenhengen menes, om leseren kan sjekke materialet lagt til på Wikipedia allerede er blitt publisert av en [[WP:RS|pålitelig kilde]], ikke om leseren tror det er sant.
#'''Ingen originalforskning''' &ndash; Wikipedia publiserer [[WP:NOT|ikke]] nye ideer: alt materiale i Wikipedia må basere seg på en [[WP:V|pålitelig, publisert kilde]]. Artikler kan ikke inneholde nye analyser eller synteser av publisert materiale, som brukes for å fremme en gitt posisjon som ikke fremmes av kilden.

Disse prinsippene ligger til grunn for typen og [[informasjonskvalitet|kvaliteten]] på materialet som er akseptabelt i Wikipedia-artikler. Siden prinsippene utfyller hverandre, skal de ikke betraktes isolert fra hverandre. Prinsippene som ligger til grunn for innholdspolitikken overstyres ikke av andre retningslinjer eller av konsensus blant bidragsyterne.<!-- tja, dette gjelder de engelske politikkene som er skrevet ut for lengst -->

<!-- uoversatt fra den engslke siden
==History of the core policies==
"[[WP:NOR|No original research]]" (NOR) has its origins in the "[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]" (NPOV) policy and the problem of dealing with undue weight and fringe theories. The core policy of Wikipedia, NPOV, is meant to provide a framework whereby editors with diverse, often conflicting, even opposing points of view can collaborate on the creation of an encyclopedia. It does so through the principle that while it is often hard for people to agree as to what is the truth, it is much easier for people to agree as to what they and others ''believe'' to be the truth. Therefore, Wikipedia does not use "truth" as a criterion for inclusion. Instead, it aims to account for different, notable views of the truth. First codified in February 2002, the objective of the NPOV policy is to produce an unbiased encyclopedia.

In the year that followed, a good deal of conflict on article talk pages involved accusations that editors were violating NPOV, and it became clear that this policy, which provided a philosophical foundation for Wikipedia, needed to be supplemented. Wikipedians developed the concept of "[[WP:V|verifiability]]" (V) as a way of ensuring the accuracy of articles by encouraging editors to cite sources; this concept was established as a policy in August 2003. Verifiability was also promoted as a way to ensure that ''notable'' views would be represented, under the assumption that the most notable views were easiest to document with sources. Notability is especially important because while NPOV encourages editors to add alternate and multiple points of view to an article, it does not claim that all views are equal. Although NPOV does not claim that some views are more truthful than others, it does acknowledge that some views are held by more people than others. Accurately representing a view therefore also means explaining who holds the view and whether it is a majority or minority view.

Soon it became evident that editors who rejected a majority view would often marshal sources to argue that a minority view was superior to a majority view&mdash;or would even add sources in order to promote the editor's own view. Therefore, the NOR policy was established in 2003 to address problematic uses of sources. The original motivation for NOR was to prevent editors from introducing fringe views in science, especially physics&mdash;or from excluding verifiable views that, in the judgement of editors, were incorrect.<ref>Wikipedia's co-founder, Jimbo Wales, has described the original research policy as originating "primarily as a practical means to deal with physics cranks, of which of course there are a number on the web. The basic concept is as follows: it can be quite difficult for us to make any valid judgment as to whether a particular thing is ''true'' or not. It isn't appropriate for us to try to determine whether someone's novel theory of physics is valid, we aren't really equipped to do that. But what we ''can'' do is check whether or not it actually has been published in reputable journals or by reputable publishers. So it's quite convenient to avoid judging the credibility of things by simply sticking to things that have been judged credible by people much better equipped to decide. The exact same principle will hold true for history, though I suppose the application will in some cases be a bit different and more subtle." [[Jimmy Wales|Wales, Jimmy]]. [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-December/017557.html "Original research"], 2004-12-03.</ref> It soon became clear that the policy should apply to any editor trying to introduce his or her own views into an article (and thus a way to distinguish Wikipedia from [[Everything 2]]).

In its earliest form, the policy singled out edits for exclusion that:
*introduce a theory or method of solution;
*introduce original ideas;
*define existing terms in different ways; or introduces [[neologism]]s;

and established as criteria for inclusion edits that present:
*ideas that have been accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal; or
*ideas that have become newsworthy: they have been repeatedly and independently reported in newspapers or news stories (such as the [[cold fusion]] story).

As a more diverse group of editors were drawn to Wikipedia, it became clear that other topics besides physics, such as politics, religion, and history, were attracting original research, and the community sought a more systematic way to define original research and to guide editors in avoiding it.<ref>[[Jimmy Wales|Wales, Jimmy]]. [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2004-December/017591.html "Original research"], 2004-12-06.</ref> The principles of "verifiability" and "no original research" overlap, and an attempt was made in 2007 to combine the two pages into one (see [[Wikipedia:Attribution]]), but it failed to gain consensus.

==References==
<references />
-->
== Se også ==
* [[w:Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2008-03-13/SPV#Tutorial:_Summary_of_policies|En oppsummering i ''Wikipedia Signpost'' av innholdspolitikken på engelsk Wikipedia]]

[[Kategori:Wikipedia-innholdsadministrativa]]