Redigerer Diskusjon:ANORG (avsnitt)

==Om International Journal of Anarchism's objektivitet og troverdighet som kilde==

The International Journal of Anarchism (IJA), http://www.anarchy.no/ija.html , the organ of AI and International Institute for Organization Research  http://www.anarchy.no/iiifor.html, the independent research institute of AI, is a Refereed scientific journal, and the only Refereed anarchist scientific journal in world, quoting from IJA's official website:


Articles to IJA may be written in any language, and should be provided with an English summary. If the article is written in English, the summary can be omitted.

International Journal of Anarchism is a Refereed scientific journal. Refereed materials are publications reviewed by "expert readers" or referees prior to the publication of the material. After reading and evaluating the material, the referee informs the publisher/editor if the document should be published or if any changes should be made prior to publication. Refereed materials are also referred to as Peer Reviewed. Refereed materials are significant to the research and the literature of library and information science because they assure readers that the information conveyed is reliable and timely. With some exceptions a refereed article is one that is blind reviewed and has two external reviewers. The blind review requirement and the use of external reviewers are consistent with the research criteria of objectivity and of knowledge. The referees can a.o.t. help you polish the content of your article by improving the grammar, punctuation, and consistency, and by making content suggestions. The referees of the IJA are independent Norwegian senior researchers loosely associated to the AI-secretariate. Their first language is Norwegian, but they are rather clever in English and other languages.<br /><br />

The electronic issues of the International Journal of Anarchism are updated every time there are significant more informations about the different events and cases. But unless special cases, they are not redistributed by e-mail when they are updated. Also the IAT and other pages at www.anarchy.no are updated almost every day. Thus, to be updated on the news and comments about anarchy, anarchist(s) and anarchism in different connections, it is necessary to visit the AIIS-web sites every day.


The IJA is listed among the other main scientific journals in the world by several universities and other academic sources, i.e. the US Oswego State University of New York's List of Economic Journals on the Web, see [http://www.oswego.edu/~economic/journals.htm], by Cpa Directory Index - Law Research, see [http://www.lawresearchservices.com/firms/admin/cpa-econ-journals.htm], Resources and Links at http://www.crsp.com, see [http://www.crsp.com/resources/links.html], by Benno Torgler - Researcher in Economics, Tax Compliance and Tax Morale, see [http://www.torgler.com/benno/linksjournals.htm], Economic journals on the web of http://cba.unomaha.edu/, [http://cba.unomaha.edu/faculty/cdecker/WEB/Economic%20journals%20on%20the%20web.htm], and  
Interneteki Ekonomi Dergileri, see  
[http://www.seyfettinartan.gen.tr/journal.htm]. The IJA is thus seen as the most reliable anarchist journal in the world. 

Grunnen til at IJA ble tatt inn på listene over vitenskapelig økonomiske journaler, er at IJA stiller seg innfor den  samfunnsvitenskapelige forskningstradisjonen som ble initiert av Nobelprisvinnerne i Økonomi, Ragnar Frisch og Trygve Haavelmo, se http://www.anarchy.no/frisch1.html . Ellers hadde vi ikke blitt listet. Ingen andre anarkist-journaler er på listene, de er bl.a. ikke Peer Reviewed, og holder derfor ikke vitenskapelige mål. Det samme gjelder selvfølgeligi "anorg-warning"-en. På bakrunn av denne beviselige objektiviteten og troverdingheten til IJA, og det som er nevnt over om sendinger og brev fra CNN, og artiklene i VG, DN og Finansavisen, etc. vil jeg igjen be deg om å fjerne taggen om tvilsom objektivitet på ANORG-Wiki-siden. Jeg syns ikke du skal la det gå prestisje i dette, men ta mine saklige argumenter for å fjerne taggen innover deg.

([[Bruker:Anna Quist|Anna Quist]] 3. aug 2008 kl. 10:46 (CEST))

:Tekstene du har referert til tidligere blir ikke mer overbevisende av at du kopierer dem inn her. De underbygger på ingen måte påstandene i artikkelen. [[Bruker:Zigkill|Zigkill]] 3. aug 2008 kl. 18:05 (CEST)

Dette underbygger det vi hevder at den såkalte "anorgwarning"-en på punktet om anarki av lav grad i Norge, der de påstar at denne konklusjonen er "A peace of hack", er uetterrettelig og usaklig.

([[Bruker:Anna Quist|Anna Quist]] 4. aug 2008 kl. 09:38 (CEST))

:: På skrivebordet har jeg liggende  tidsskriftet '''Anarchist Studies''', redigert av   Sharif Gemie ved University of Glamorgan og utgitt av det akademiske forlaget  Lawrence & Wishart. I redaksjonsrådet sitter en lang rekke  internasjonalt kjente akademikere. Likevel skriver altså ANORG at deres elektroniske publikasjon  er "the  only Refereed anarchist scientific journal in world". Men  Anarchist Studies er vel heller '''peer reviewed''' enn '''Refereed'''?[[Bruker:Vindheim|Vindheim]] 6. aug 2008 kl. 19:48 (CEST)