Redigerer Energikilde (avsnitt)

====Debatten om kjernekraft====
Det har vært en langvarig og intens debatt om kjernekraft rundt om i verden.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2011/mar/27/nuclear-controversy/ |title=The nuclear controversy |author=Union-Tribune Editorial Board  |date=27. mars 2011 |work=Union-Tribune  }}</ref><ref name="jstor.org">James J. MacKenzie. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/2823429 Review of The Nuclear Power Controversy] by [[Arthur W. Murphy]] ''The Quarterly Review of Biology'', Vol. 52, No. 4 (Dec., 1977), pp. 467-468.</ref><ref name="A Reasonable Bet on Nuclear Power">In February 2010 the nuclear power debate played out on the pages of the ''[[The New York Times]]'', see [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/18/opinion/18thur2.html?scp=1&sq=a%20reasonable%20bet%20on%20nuclear%20power&st=cse A Reasonable Bet on Nuclear Power] and [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/20/opinion/l20nuclear.html Revisiting Nuclear Power: A Debate] and [http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/a-comeback-for-nuclear-power/ A Comeback for Nuclear Power?]</ref> Tilhengere som for eksempel World Nuclear Association, IAEA og Miljøvernere for Nuclear Energy hevder at kjernekraft er en trygg bærekraftig energikilde som reduserer verdens karbonutslipp.<ref name="bloomberg.com">{{Kilde www |url=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=aXb5iuqdZoD4&refer=us |tittel=U.S. Energy Legislation May Be 'Renaissance' for Nuclear Power |besøksdato=2014-09-27 |arkiv-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080922213116/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103 |arkivdato=2008-09-22 |url-status=død }}</ref> Motstandere av kjernekraft, som [[Greenpeace]] og [[Nuclear Information and Resource Service]], hevder at kjernekraft utgjør en stor trussel mot mennesker og miljø.<ref name="Share">{{cite web |author=Share |url=http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/4-nuclear-waste-pools-in-north-carolina/ |title=Nuclear Waste Pools in North Carolina |publisher=Projectcensored.org |accessdate=2010-08-24 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100725030831/http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/4-nuclear-waste-pools-in-north-carolina/ |archivedate=2010-07-25 }} {{Kilde www |url=http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/4-nuclear-waste-pools-in-north-carolina/ |tittel=Arkivert kopi |besøksdato=2014-09-27 |arkiv-dato=2017-10-19 |arkiv-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171019183432/http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/4-nuclear-waste-pools-in-north-carolina/ |url-status=yes }}</ref><ref name="NC WARN » Nuclear Power">{{cite web|url=http://www.ncwarn.org/?cat=18 |title=Nuclear Power |publisher=Nc Warn |accessdate=2013-06-22}}</ref><ref name="Sturgis">{{cite web |last=Sturgis |first=Sue |url=http://www.southernstudies.org/2009/04/post-4.html |title=Investigation: Revelations about Three Mile Island disaster raise doubts over nuclear plant safety |publisher=Southernstudies.org |accessdate=2010-08-24 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100418063024/http://www.southernstudies.org/2009/04/post-4.html |archivedate=2010-04-18 |tittel=Arkivert kopi |besøksdato=2010-08-24 |arkivurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100418063024/http://www.southernstudies.org/2009/04/post-4.html |arkivdato=2010-04-18 |url-status=død }} {{Kilde www |url=http://www.southernstudies.org/2009/04/post-4.html |tittel=Arkivert kopi |besøksdato=2014-09-27 |arkiv-dato=2010-02-09 |arkiv-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100209051243/http://www.southernstudies.org/2009/04/post-4.html |url-status=yes }}</ref>