Redigerer Wikipedia (avsnitt)

=== Redigeringskrig ===

Bidragsytere til Wikipedia (omtalt som Wikipedianere) har ofte uenighet om innhold, og det kan føre til gjentatte endringer i en artikkel, kjent som redigeringskrig (engelsk: edit warring).<ref>{{Kilde www|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution|tittel=Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|besøksdato=23. oktober 2021|forlag=Wikipedia|sitat=If discussion stalemates, editors may seek outside input to help resolve the dispute. Discussions can be advertised to noticeboards and WikiProjects to receive participation from interested uninvolved editors. Mediation can also help in finding a compromise solution. As content decisions on Wikipedia are made through consensus, the final stage in content dispute resolution is a request for comments, where a discussion is advertised to uninvolved editors to receive broad input on the issue.}}</ref><ref name="NBC WP editorial warzone 12">{{cite news |last=Coldewey |first=Devin |date=21. juni 2012 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20140822010030/http://sys03-public.nbcnews.com/technology/wikipedia-editorial-warzone-says-study-838793 |title=Wikipedia is editorial warzone, says study |department=Technology |work=[[NBC News]] |url=https://sys03-public.nbcnews.com/technology/wikipedia-editorial-warzone-says-study-838793 |archive-date=22. august 2014 |accessdate=2021-10-23 |archivedate=2014-08-22 |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20140822010030/http://sys03-public.nbcnews.com/technology/wikipedia-editorial-warzone-says-study-838793 |url-status=yes }}</ref> Det er sett som et ressurskrevende scenario, hvor ingen brukbar kunnskap blir lagt til,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kalyanasundaram |first1=Arun |last2=Wei |first2=Wei |last3=Carley |first3=Kathleen M. |last4=Herbsleb |first4=James D. |date=desember 2015 |title=An agent-based model of edit wars in Wikipedia: How and when is consensus reached |journal=2015 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) |location=Huntington Beach, CA, USA |publisher=IEEE |pages=276–287 |doi=10.1109/WSC.2015.7408171 |isbn=9781467397438|s2cid=9353425 }}</ref> kritisert for å skape en konkurransedrevet<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Suh |first1=Bongwon |last2=Convertino |first2=Gregorio |last3=Chi |first3=Ed H. |last4=Pirolli |first4=Peter |date=2009 |title=The singularity is not near: slowing growth of Wikipedia |url=https://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1641309.1641322 |journal=Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration&nbsp;– WikiSym '09 |pages=1–10 |location=Orlando, Florida |publisher=ACM Press |doi=10.1145/1641309.1641322 |isbn=9781605587301|doi-access=free }}</ref> og konflikt-basert<ref>{{cite news |url=https://hbr.org/2016/06/why-do-so-few-women-edit-wikipedia |title=Why Do So Few Women Edit Wikipedia? |last=Torres |first=Nicole |date=2. juni 2016 |work=Harvard Business Review |access-date=20. august 2019 |issn=0017-8012}}</ref> redigeringskultur, assosiert med en tradisjonell maskulin [[Kjønnsroller|kjønnsrolle]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bear |first1=Julia B. |last2=Collier |first2=Benjamin |date=mars 2016 |title=Where are the Women in Wikipedia? Understanding the Different Psychological Experiences of Men and Women in Wikipedia |journal=Sex Roles |volume=74 |issue=5–6 |pages=254–265 |doi=10.1007/s11199-015-0573-y |s2cid=146452625 |issn=0360-0025}}</ref>